Dynamic nature of BRAF or KRAS p.G12C mutations in second-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer patients: do early and late effects exist?

INTRODUCTION: The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling network aberrations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) generate intrinsic dynamic effects and temporal variations that are crucial but often overlooked in clinical trial populations. Here, we investigate the time-varying impact of MAPK pathway mutation genotype on each treatment line's contribution to the overall clinical course. METHODS: The PROMETEO study focused on mCRC patients undergoing second-line treatment at 20 hospitals. We evaluated genotypes and employed flexible models to analyse the dynamic effect of each mutation. RESULTS: We examined data derived from 1160 patients. The effects of KRAS G12C or G12V, and BRAF V600E are clearly time-varying, with unexpected consequences such as the deleterious effect of BRAF V600E vs other genotypes dissipating over time when subjects receive antiangiogenics, or KRAS G12V and G12C showing increasing aggressiveness over time. Thus, contrary to expectations, the 12-month survival rate from the second line for those who survived >6 months was 49.9% (95% CI, 32.7-67.3) for KRAS G12C and 59% (95% CI, 38.5-80.6) for BRAF V600E. CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic perspective is essential for understanding the behaviour of tumours with specific genotypes, especially from the second line onward. This may be relevant in patient monitoring and treatment decision-making, particularly in cases with distinct mutations.

Stage IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with loss of expression of MSH2 and MSH6: hereditary cancer syndrome?

We present the case of a 69-year-old male diagnosed with stage IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with loss of expression of MSH2 and MSH6 proteins, but somatic wild type MSH2 and MSH6 genes with Oncomine Comprehensive Assay (OCA) genomic sequencing panel. In his cancer family history, there was a maternal aunt with sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma also missing MSH2 and MSH6 protein expression. Subsequently, we will discuss whether or not we are facing a hereditary cancer syndrome.

KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer: could we talk about a risk factor for the development of thromboembolic phenomena?

The oncogenic KRAS mutation is associated with increased tissue factor expression and thus hypercoagulability. In this regard, numerous studies published in the last decade have shown that KRAS mutations are an important risk factor for the development of thromboembolic phenomena in neoplasms of the digestive tract, such as colorectal cancer. On the other hand, some recently published studies suggest that KRAS mutations are also associated with an increased risk of developing thromboembolic phenomena in pancreatic cancer. Based on these premises, we have conducted a single-centre retrospective study on a cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer. Our aim is to demonstrate whether there is an association between the presence of KRAS mutations in our cohort of pancreatic cancer patients and an increased risk of developing thromboembolic phenomena.

Stage IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with loss of expression of MSH2 and MSH6: hereditary cancer syndrome?

We present the case of a 69-year-old male diagnosed with stage IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with loss of expression of MSH2 and MSH6 proteins, but somatic wild type MSH2 and MSH6 genes with Oncomine Comprehensive Assay (OCA) genomic sequencing panel. In his cancer family history, there was a maternal aunt with sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma also missing MSH2 and MSH6 protein expression. Subsequently, we will discuss whether or not we are facing a hereditary cancer syndrome. (AU)

KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer: could we talk about a risk factor for the development of thromboembolic phenomena?

The oncogenic KRAS mutation is associated with increased tissue factor expression and thus hypercoagulability. In this regard, numerous studies published in the last decade have shown that KRAS mutations are an important risk factor for the development of thromboembolic phenomena in neoplasms of the digestive tract, such as colorectal cancer. On the other hand, some recently published studies suggest that KRAS mutations are also associated with an increased risk of developing thromboembolic phenomena in pancreatic cancer. Based on these premises, we have conducted a single-centre retrospective study on a cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer. Our aim is to demonstrate whether there is an association between the presence of KRAS mutations in our cohort of pancreatic cancer patients and an increased risk of developing thromboembolic phenomena. (AU)

Diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma during pregnancy and genetic counseling.

We present the case of a 38-year-old woman who, in the context of a 22-week gestation, was diagnosed with diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma. The age of the patient and the way in which the cancer presented itself, make genetic counseling mandatory to rule out hereditary diffuse gastric carcinoma syndrome. This rare entity, of autosomal dominant inheritance and closely linked to mutations in the CDH1 (in most cases) and CTNNA1 genes, is associated with a greater predisposition to develop malignant neoplasms of the breast and stomach. Genetic sequencing ruled out hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. Unfortunately, 24 months after the cesarean section, our patient dies.

Phase II clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the BIBABRAX study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), global health status (GHS), and deterioration-free survival of an elderly population (> 70 years) with unresectable locally advanced (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated with nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine. METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial, patients received 4-week cycles of intravenous (i.v.) nab-paclitaxel at a dose of 125 mg/m2, followed by i.v. injections of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary outcome was the HRQoL (deterioration-free rate at 3 months as evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. RESULTS: Eighty patients (median age: 74.6 years) were enrolled (56 with mPC, 24 with LAPC). The percentage of patients who had not experienced deterioration at 3 months was 54.3% (95% CI 41.6-67.0%). The median (interquartile range) time until definite deterioration was 1.6 (1.1-3.7) months. The objective response rate and clinical benefit rate were achieved by 11 (13.8%, 95% CI 6.2-21.3%) and 54 patients (67.5%, 95% CI 57.2-77.8%), respectively. The median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 6.9-11.5), and the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI 5.8-8.5). Only fatigue and neutropenia demonstrated a grade 3-4 toxicity incidence > 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the clinical benefit of the combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in an elderly population with pancreatic cancer in terms of improved survival and clinical response. However, we were unable to confirm a benefit in terms of quality-of-life.

Prognostic Nomogram and Patterns of Use of FOLFIRI-Aflibercept in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Data Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The VELOUR study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adding aflibercept to FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, a nomogram that can stratify patients according to prognosis is unavailable, and the frequency and effect of the pragmatic use of modified schedules in actual practice remains unknown. METHOD: The sample consists of 250 patients with mCRC treated with aflibercept and irinotecan-based chemotherapy at nine Spanish academic centers between January 2013 and September 2015. The result of a Cox proportional hazards model regression for overall survival (OS), adjusted for covariates available in daily practice, was represented as a nomogram and web-based calculator. Harrell's c-index was used to assess discrimination. RESULTS: The prognostic nomogram for OS includes six variables: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, mutational status, better response to previous treatment(s), and carcinoembryonic antigen. The model is well calibrated and has acceptable discriminatory capacity (optimism-corrected c-index, 0.723; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.666-0.778). Median OS was 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.8), 12.4 months (95% CI, 9.36-14.8), and 22.9 months (95% CI, 16.6-not reached) for high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups, respectively. Age, comorbidity, or use of modified FOLFIRI regimens did not affect prognosis in this series. Grade 3-4 adverse events were less common following modified schedules. The admission rate because of toxicity was higher in ≥65 years (9.7% vs. 19.6%; odds ratio, 2.26; p = .029). CONCLUSION: We have developed and internally validated a prognostic model for use in individuals with colorectal cancer initiating therapy with FOLFIRI-aflibercept to predict both OS and the effect of pragmatic modifications of the classic regime on efficacy and safety. This can aid in decision making and in designing future trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this study, the authors developed and conducted the internal validation of a prognostic nomogram that makes it possible to stratify patients who are eligible for second-line FOLFIRI-aflibercept based on their probability of survival. This model was developed in a multicenter sample from nine Spanish hospitals. Furthermore, to increase the study's validity, the practical use of aflibercept in this setting was investigated, including doses or pragmatic modifications. The results suggest that the modified schedules often used in this daily clinical practice-based patient population are associated with less severe toxicity without apparent detriment to survival endpoints. It is believed that these data complement the information provided by the VELOUR trial and are relevant for the oncologist in treating colon cancer in the second-line setting.